History · review workflow
History IA Review
Upload your Historical Investigation (IA) and get criterion-by-criterion feedback using the configured History assessment criteria for the selected session. The product supports the configured Higher Level (HL) and Standard Level (SL) context where the subject distinguishes levels. Start with 60 Shells; sign in to keep review history tied to your account.
Still planning the IA rather than checking a draft? Read the History IA guide or browse History IA topics and research questions.
What the History review checks
Rubric context
3 configured criteria worth 25 marks in the current History model used by this product.
Feedback output
Criterion-level comments plus prioritized fixes, so the next revision step is explicit.
Review scope
Checks a provided draft against the selected criteria and returns comments and prioritized next steps.
Score boundary
Practice feedback only; the score is not an official grade or a prediction of examiner agreement.
Which criteria are configured?
This product page shows the configuration the grader uses. The full descriptors, mark bands, common mistakes, structure guidance, and subject-specific examples live in the separate History guide.
Product boundaries students should know
Review scope
Where a supported review workflow is configured, iBacalao checks a draft you provide against the selected criteria and returns feedback and suggested next steps. Diploma Programme IA, Extended Essay, and TOK are specialist examples of that review path. Review AI-assisted work and follow your school's rules.
Practice score, not an official grade
An iBacalao score is practice feedback against configured criteria. It is not an official exam grade, a predicted final grade, or evidence of agreement with examiners.
Check the rules for your assessed work
IB guidance does not blanket-ban AI tools. AI-generated material used in assessed work must be acknowledged and referenced; schools may apply additional rules.
Product questions
What does the History IA review check?
It reviews a student-authored Historical Investigation (IA) against the configured History criteria for the selected assessment context. This configuration contains 3 criteria worth 25 marks in total.
Does iBacalao write or rewrite my History IA?
Where a supported review workflow is configured, iBacalao checks a draft you provide against the selected criteria and returns feedback and suggested next steps. Diploma Programme IA, Extended Essay, and TOK are specialist examples of that review path. Review AI-assisted work and follow your school's rules.
Is an iBacalao score an official grade?
An iBacalao score is practice feedback against configured criteria. It is not an official exam grade, a predicted final grade, or evidence of agreement with examiners.
What should I check before using AI feedback for assessed work?
IB guidance does not blanket-ban AI tools. AI-generated material used in assessed work must be acknowledged and referenced; schools may apply additional rules.