Draft Compare
See what improved, what stayed weak, and what needs attention next.
Draft 1
9 / 24
2026-09-02
Change
+7
estimated draft score movement
Draft 3
16 / 24
2026-10-04
Criterion movement
| Criterion | Draft 1 | Draft 3 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Personal Engagement | 1 / 2 | 2 / 2 | +1 |
| Exploration | 2 / 6 | 4 / 6 | +2 |
| Analysis | 2 / 6 | 4 / 6 | +2 |
| Evaluation | 2 / 6 | 3 / 6 | +1 |
| Communication | 2 / 4 | 3 / 4 | +1 |
Personal Engagement
1→2+1
Exploration
2→4+2
Analysis
2→4+2
Evaluation
2→3+1
Communication
2→3+1
What improved
- Personal Engagement improved by 1 mark.
- Exploration improved by 2 marks.
- Analysis improved by 2 marks.
- Evaluation improved by 1 mark.
- Communication improved by 1 mark.
Still weak
- None detected.
What to do next
- Ask the student to revise one Evaluation paragraph using: limitation → impact → specific improvement.
- Schedule a 10-minute conference before the next submission.
All figures are estimated draft-level scores. Not official IB marks.