Comparison guide
ChatGPT vs iBacalao for IB IA feedback
Students often ask whether ChatGPT or a dedicated IB tool is better for Internal Assessment revision. ChatGPT is a general assistant; iBacalao is built only for IB Diploma work — it binds reviews to configured subject/session criteria across 26 supported subjects and does not generate replacement draft text for you.
The right choice depends on what you need: brainstorming and general writing help versus rubric-grounded, criterion-level comments tied to your subject guide. This comparison focuses on the revision use case most students care about before teacher submission.
| Feature | ChatGPT | iBacalao |
|---|---|---|
| Rubric binding | Can use criteria supplied in the conversation; current subject/session rubric is not inherently guaranteed | Review is bound to the configured subject/session criteria |
| Criterion scoring | Unstructured paragraphs | Per-criterion scores with ranked fixes |
| Draft generation | Can generate draft text; students must follow IB and school rules for assessed work | Feedback-only workflow; does not write replacement IA text |
| Pricing | Free and paid plans — verify current OpenAI pricing | Student Plus free monthly; Pro / Ultra available |
| Subjects covered | General-purpose; depends on the context supplied | 26 supported subjects + EE + TOK |
| Turnitin / data handling | No direct Turnitin submission; data handling depends on the ChatGPT plan and settings | No Turnitin submission; review history deletable anytime |
Frequently asked questions
- Should I use ChatGPT or iBacalao for my Internal Assessment?
- Use iBacalao when you want a workflow that binds a review to iBacalao’s configured subject/session rubric. ChatGPT is a general-purpose assistant and can work with criteria you provide, but it does not inherently guarantee that the current rubric for your exact subject and session is loaded on every conversation.
- Can ChatGPT use IB assessment criteria?
- Yes, if the relevant criteria are supplied or otherwise available in the conversation. The difference is workflow: iBacalao binds reviews to its configured rubric for 26 supported subjects and scores each criterion individually; a general ChatGPT conversation does not by itself guarantee the correct current rubric or assessment session.
- Is using ChatGPT for an Internal Assessment academic misconduct?
- The IB does not ban AI tools, but AI-generated material included in assessed work must be acknowledged and referenced; presenting AI-produced work as your own is academic misconduct. Schools may also set their own rules. iBacalao is designed to comment on student-authored work rather than generate replacement draft text.
- Which is cheaper for IB students?
- ChatGPT offers free and paid plans; check OpenAI’s current pricing for the plan you are considering. iBacalao offers Student Plus free every month, while Pro and Ultra remain available for higher limits.
- Does either tool submit my IA to Turnitin?
- Neither submits to Turnitin directly. iBacalao uses your draft to generate feedback; if you're signed in, an extract is kept in your deletable review history. Pasting into ChatGPT sends text to OpenAI's systems — check your school's AI policy for both.
Sources & verification
Primary-source references used to verify key assessment facts on this page. Last source check: September 22, 2026.
Product capabilities and pricing can change. This page avoids treating a general-purpose AI product as if it had one fixed rubric configuration.
- IB — Artificial intelligence in learning, teaching and assessmentPrimary source for the academic-integrity statements about acknowledging and referencing AI-generated material.
Try criterion-by-criterion feedback on your subject at iBacalao subject feedback or see our full Internal Assessment feedback tools comparison.
Stop reading about it
Upload your draft and get criterion-by-criterion feedback in minutes.